December 16, 2025 (Navroze Bureau) : Actor Nikitin Dheer has come out strongly in support of Ranveer Singh’s film ‘Dhurandhar’ amid an ongoing debate that has seen sections of social media label the movie as “propaganda-driven.” Taking to public platforms, Dheer urged audiences to form opinions based on facts rather than narratives shaped by what he described as “pseudo-intellectuals.” His remarks have reignited conversations around creative freedom, interpretation of cinema, and the role of ideology in storytelling.
The controversy erupted soon after Dhurandhar gained massive box office success, with critics and commentators offering sharply divided views on the film’s themes. While some praised the movie for its scale, performances, and patriotic undertones, others questioned its political messaging.
Nikitin Dheer’s Strong Defence
Nikitin Dheer, who is known for voicing candid opinions, defended the film and its makers, stating that cinema should not be prematurely boxed into ideological categories. He emphasised that Dhurandhar is a work of fiction rooted in drama and action, not a political manifesto.
In his statement, Dheer remarked that audiences should avoid being influenced by selective interpretations and instead engage with the film on its artistic merits. His use of the phrase “may we not be misled by pseudo-intellectuals” struck a chord with supporters of the film, while also drawing criticism from those who felt the comment dismissed genuine critique.
Ranveer Singh’s Film at the Centre of Debate
Dhurandhar, starring Ranveer Singh in a high-intensity role, has emerged as one of the year’s biggest commercial successes. The film blends espionage, nationalism, and personal conflict, elements that have traditionally sparked strong emotional reactions among viewers.
As the film crossed major box office milestones, scrutiny intensified—not just of its narrative, but also of its perceived messaging. Industry observers note that commercial success often amplifies discourse, especially when films touch upon themes of national identity and power.
Aditya Dhar Responds
Director Aditya Dhar also addressed the controversy, choosing a measured and composed tone. Without directly engaging with critics, Dhar reiterated that Dhurandhar was conceived as a story-driven cinematic experience, not a political statement.
Dhar stressed that films are meant to provoke thought, emotion, and discussion, and that differing interpretations are inevitable. However, he cautioned against reducing complex narratives to simplistic labels, adding that the team poured years of effort into creating an engaging, technically sound film.
Industry Divided Over ‘Propaganda’ Label
The debate surrounding Dhurandhar has highlighted a broader issue within Indian cinema—where does storytelling end and propaganda begin? Filmmakers and critics have long grappled with this question, especially as cinema increasingly reflects socio-political realities.
Some industry voices argue that labeling films as propaganda often reflects personal biases rather than objective critique. Others maintain that questioning narratives is essential in a democratic society. The Dhurandhar debate has thus become symbolic of this larger cultural tension.
Social Media Reactions
On social media, reactions have been sharply polarised. Supporters praised Nikitin Dheer for “speaking up for creative freedom,” while critics accused him of dismissing valid criticism. Hashtags related to the film trended widely, with fans sharing clips, dialogues, and box office figures to reinforce their support.
Despite the online noise, the film’s theatrical performance remains unaffected, suggesting that audiences are largely separating entertainment value from ideological debates.
Box Office vs Controversy
Trade analysts note that controversy has had little impact on Dhurandhar’s commercial trajectory. In fact, heightened discussions may have contributed to sustained interest and repeat viewership.
The film’s success reinforces the idea that audience engagement is multifaceted—viewers may acknowledge debate while still appreciating performances, action, and storytelling.
Experts on Creative Interpretation
Film scholars and media experts caution against absolutist interpretations of cinema. They argue that films often mirror the socio-political environment of their time, but that does not automatically make them propaganda.
Experts also warn that over-politicising creative works can discourage experimentation and lead to self-censorship among filmmakers.
Conclusion
As the debate around Dhurandhar continues, voices like Nikitin Dheer and Aditya Dhar highlight the need for balanced discourse. While critique is essential, reducing a film’s identity to ideological labels risks oversimplifying complex creative efforts. Ultimately, Dhurandhar’s impact—both commercially and culturally—underscores cinema’s enduring power to provoke conversation.
Summary
Nikitin Dheer defended Ranveer Singh’s ‘Dhurandhar’ amid propaganda allegations, urging audiences not to be misled by selective criticism, while director Aditya