The TNPSC Group 4 exam, held on 12 July 2025, saw its official answer key released on 21 July 2025, with objections accepted until 28 July 2025 . Most authoritative education portals now project that the results will be released in August 2025 .
Cut‑Off Insights & What to Expect
- Pass Marks vs. Cut-Off: In 2024, candidates needed a minimum of 90 out of 300 to pass, and Part B was evaluated only if 60 marks (40%) were achieved in Part A
- Estimated Cut‑Off Ranges (2024): Based on expert and candidate feedback: CategoryMale (Expected)Female (Expected)General146–151152–155OBC143–147146–150BCM142–145139–146MBC143–146144–147SC137–141139–142SC-A133–137135–138ST132–135133–136
These figures provide a helpful benchmark, though the actual cut‑offs may vary depending on factors like difficulty level, number of applicants, and vacancies
Why Luck Still Plays a Role
- Normalized Scoring: TNPSC exams are often held in multiple shifts, and normalization processes can adjust scores. A small margin—sometimes just a few marks—can change your rank and qualifying status significantly .
- Tight Competition: As one aspirant noted: “Even for the topmost posts there is only 4‑5 marks difference between UR and OBC/EWS people.”
“Last year the cut‑off for ASO MEA was 331 for UR, 329 for OBC and 327 for EWS.”
These stories illustrate how minor marks differences, timing, and exam-day nuances can sway outcomes—bringing luck and minor edge factors into play.
Overview at a Glance
| Element | Details |
|---|---|
| Exam Conducted | 12 July 2025 |
| Answer Key | Released 21 July; objections till 28 July |
| Result Expected | August 2025 |
| Pass Marks | 90/300 overall; 60/150 in Part A to evaluate Part B |
| Expected Cut‑Offs | General: ~150+; Other categories slightly lower |
| Key Influencers | Difficulty level, vacancies, normalization, tight score differences |
Final Thoughts
If you’ve scored close to your category’s expected cut-off range—especially within a few marks—it’s wise to stay hopeful. Small margins can make a huge difference, and with normalization and applicant behavior factored in, your result could swing either way.